Skip to content


January 3, 2011

Post by Robyn McCullough, Amicus Community Engagement Coordinator

Last month, after attending a lengthy meeting about best practices for reentry, I found myself thinking that I really needed to purchase Rosetta Stone’s Criminal Justice/Reentry language software and begin my studies immediately!  Ok, so everybody was speaking English at this meeting, but at times it felt like I was listening to a foreign language—what with all the acronyms, idioms and industry-specific vocab so casually thrown about.  It’s hard to deny that we in the reentry biz definitely have our own vernacular—if not our very own language.

Photo by Greeblie

Given my experience (I’m considered a “professional” in reentry), I can only imagine what kind of confusion the non-industry bystander must undergo when stuck listening to one of us insiders ramble on using this acronym or that. What follows is a brief intro to the lexicon of reentry and one of its most commonly used and oft misunderstood terms: RECIDIVISM.

Its definition in Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary reads:

“recidivism. noun. \ri-si-də-vi-zəm\ : a tendency to relapse into a previous condition or mode of behavior; especially : relapse into criminal behavior”

Recidivism is the behavior or condition, and a “recidivist” is someone who “recidivates.” We measure the rate of recidivism by tracking offenders released from prison and monitoring whether or not they re-offend (commit a new crime) or violate their parole. A parole violation includes anything from failing to make a meeting with their Supervised Release Agent to  failing to find a place to live within a certain amount of time. Both result in a return to prison.  The most recent nationwide study of recidivism indicates  “A quarter of adults exiting parole in 2008 — 133,947 individuals — returned to prison as a result of violating their terms of supervision, and 9 percent of adults exiting parole returned to prison as a result of a new conviction”

That’s a lot of verbiage, but hopefully you have a better handle on that tricky r-word. We can expect to hear the word “recidivism” more often not only in our niche field of reentry, but in the wider public realm; prison overcrowding, growing annual corrections spending, and discouraging statistics about recidivism nationwide are creating the need for more and better reentry services.

I’ll leave you with a quote from a speech by Attorney General Eric Holder given in July, 2010:

photo by Ryan J Reilly

“Over the last few decades, state spending on corrections has risen faster than nearly any other budget item.  Yet, at a cost of $60 billion a year, our prisons and jails do little to prepare prisoners to get jobs and “go straight” after they’re released.  People who have been incarcerated are often barred from housing, shunned by potential employers and surrounded by others in similar circumstances.  This is a recipe for high recidivism.  And it’s the reason that two-thirds of those released are rearrested within three years.   It’s time for a new approach.”

Time for a new approach, indeed.

4 Comments leave one →
  1. David permalink
    January 3, 2011 11:52 am

    I am a felon; I have been out for almost five years; after serving the same. The rate at which a person returns to prison, is directly related to the rate in which they were sent…the art of prosecution is a career, more than an avenue for justice, as is the disparage of a public defense. Prison is and unless major reform occurs will continue to be, big business. Fear is big business, it does not take dollars to reform this problem, nor harsher or stiffer penalties and laws, it takes a campaign against fear, and a national stand to embrace the broken neighborhoods and communities that exist today, because no one is minding their neighbors business families, children, and our nation suffers.

    • January 3, 2011 10:00 pm

      David, thank you for your insights. Yes, I can see your point. Fear plays a huge role and it is not being addressed. And as you say, prison and prosecution are big businesses, just like cancer. If they weren’t, there would probably be solutions. And yet there have to be some dedicated professionals in these professions, men and women who believe fiercely in what they’re doing (just like Robert E. Lee, who died believing the wrong side had won the Civil War). My son in law, an ex-offender, has been out of prison for eight months. Without his wife, who earns a good living, I doubt he would have been able to remain free. The system makes it so difficult. Congrats on beating the odds.

  2. January 21, 2011 10:11 pm

    Wow. Your blog offers a lot of great insight into this area. It’s going to take me a while to read and catch up. As someone who had the intention of going to law school, you offer a whole new perspective on the legal system. I truly thank you for that.

    Okay, going to get back to reading…

    • February 16, 2011 11:46 am

      Jessica–thank you for your kind words! I hope our blog continues to open your eyes to new perspectives and I also hope that you continue to comment and challenge us to open our eyes to new perspectives. Happy reading!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: